The great psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud attempted to deal with Religion in his final book “Moses and Montheism”. This was not received very well - not by the Orthodox Jews, and not by secular academics. Briefly, his thesis was that the Israelites rose up in the wilderness, against Moses, and killed him. But because of this guilt, they established a monotheistic religion, which became Judaism. Moses was then possibly replaced by a Midianite priest, who also took on the name Moses.
Whilst this appears as sheer fantasy, it is in fact not a novel theory, but perhaps a distorted or displaced theory of statements in the Talmud, and maybe even the Torah.
In the Talmud Yerushalmi (the less commonly studied version) Sanhedrin 2:6 , a remarkable story is told. It claims that King Solomon was deposed from his throne, by an angel, who then replaced him on the throne!
“It is written: To amusement I said, be praised. The
Holy One, praise to him, said to Solomon: What is this crown on your head?
Descend from My throne! Rebbi Yose ben Ḥanina said, at that moment an angel
came down looking like Solomon, removed him from his throne, and sat in his
stead. He was going around in synagogues and houses of study, saying I am
Ecclesiastes, I used to be king over
https://www.sefaria.org/Jerusalem_Talmud_Sanhedrin.2.6.7?lang=bi&with=all&lang2=en
This story is sheer fantasy, and has no basis in the Tanakh. For a more detailed analysis see Rabbi Nachum Rabinowitz’s excellent essay:
So far, we have seen a theory about Moses, written by Freud in the 20th century, which is remarkably similar to the story told in the Talmud Yerushalmi, which was written about 1500 years earlier. The displacement of the story is that whereas the Yerushalmi is talking about King Solomon, Freud has applied the core concept to Moses. The further distortion is that the Yerushalmi speaks of an “angel” who ousted Solomon, and took his throne, whereas for Freud, it was the people who arose and ousted (murdered) Moses.
Is there any basis in the Torah itself for Freud’s assertions regarding Moses?
The Torah tells us a course of events, which lead to Moses being prevented from Entering Israel, and sadly dying outside of the Land. But Moses in turn blames the people for this, as they were ultimately responsible for his ownpuishment:
Deuteronomy Chapter 1 דְּבָרִים
37 Also the LORD was
angry with me for your sakes, saying: Thou also shalt not go in thither;
38 Joshua the son of
Nun, who standeth before thee, he shall go in thither; encourage thou him, for
he shall cause
Deuteronomy Chapter 3 דְּבָרִים
25 Let me go over, I
pray Thee, and see the good land that is beyond the
26 But the LORD was
wroth with me for your sakes, and hearkened not unto me; and the LORD said unto
me: 'Let it suffice thee; speak no more unto Me of this matter.
28 But charge Joshua, and encourage him, and strengthen him; for he shall go over before this people, and he shall cause them to inherit the land which thou shalt see.
So Moses himself sees this as a punishment, which was due to the behaviour of the people, although indirect. And his replacement is Joshua.
Freud was aware of the Torah’s own narrative, and presumably also of the Talmud.
There is some basis
for his claims, although it does take a different course from what the Torah
says, and is somewhat in line with the Talmudic formulation regarding Solomon. Freud is projecting his own theories of the
subconscious and trying to derive a new theory about religion. Moses would not agree with Freud, but he did
place the punishment he suffers on the shoulders of the people, who caused this in the first place. In fact their rebellious nature , against Moses, led to his receiving a punishment and dying
before reaching
No comments:
Post a Comment