*
The opinions or possible understandings here are entirely my own, and
they do not represent normative Orthodox or Karaite Judaism.
In
an online discussion with a Rabbinical student, I was asked how the
Karaites derived from the Torah that a fast is required on Yom
HaKippurim?
My
answer was twofold – either there was an understanding of Biblical
Hebrew at the time, that וְעִנִּיתֶם
אֶת-נַפְשֹׁתֵיכֶם
means to afflict one's soul by fasting (perhaps)was
an expression understood by speakers of Hebrew, or that the Torah
does not specify how to afflict one's soul. And hence it is down to
the individual to decide an appropriate method. The Rabbinical
student was unable to understand my point. So it might be
appropriate to look at how this question has been addressed by
Karaites and how it is addressed by the Tanakh.
Certainly,
Karaites agree that this refers to a fast, i.e. abstaining form food
and drink. If anything,
the
Karaites are stricter than the rabbanites, since there are less
leniencies (e.g. for the frail , for children, pregnant women etc.)
also
stresses the various references in the TaNaKh where people would
afflict their souls by fasting.
But
is this proof sufficient? Is refraining from food and drink alone,
what is required?
In
answer to the Rabbanite's question, it seems to me, that the
Rabbanites have their tradition, which is the Oral Law, to rely on,
and that defines what the Torah means for them; whereas, the Karaites
have the kind of passages cited in the above website, where in the
Tanach, afflicting one's soul was associated by fasting, i.e. this
was the understanding of fasting by the Neviim. Hence, we don't need
an oral tradition to tell us this, when the Written tradition
provides enough clues!
And
the use of the word Nefesh to describe appetite or throat is not
totally convincing. There are other uses and meanings of this word:
כִּ֣י
נֶ֣פֶשׁ הַבָּשָׂר֮ בַּדָּ֣ם הִוא֒
וַאֲנִ֞י נְתַתִּ֤יו לָכֶם֙ עַל־הַמִּזְבֵּ֔חַ
לְכַפֵּ֖ר עַל־נַפְשֹׁתֵיכֶ֑ם כִּֽי־הַדָּ֥ם
ה֖וּא בַּנֶּ֥פֶשׁ יְכַפֵּֽר׃
For the life of the
flesh is in the blood, and I have assigned it to you for making
expiation for your lives upon the altar; it is the blood, as life,
that effects expiation.
Here,
Nefesh is blood and also the life force. So perhaps this verse
indicates that the Nefesh of Yom Kippur is the blood, and that we
should make a blood sacrifice?
Also,
reading of Isaiah 58 in context reveals, at least to this reader,
a different perspective altogether.
Verses
1-4 are criticisms of the people, who have atoned by keeping halachic
fasts – similar to the Rabbanites and Karaites. They have not eaten
or drunk water.
V.5
is a criticism of the very halachic fasting that is understood by
both Rabbinic and Karaite yeshiva students:
5
Is such the fast that I have chosen? the day for a man to afflict his
soul? Is it to bow down his head as a bulrush, and to spread
sackcloth and ashes under him? Wilt thou call this a fast, and an
acceptable day to the LORD?
The
use of sackcloth and ashes were a typical mode of fasting, and are
still in use by some ultra-religious people, e.g. on the Fast of Av.
Why then, is Isaiah critical of the halacha? He is claimed to be
either a Rabbanite or a Karaite, but he is critical of what is common
between both sects!
Verse
6-10 actually provide an alternative reality, or understanding of the
“fast” - presumably Yom HaKippurim.
7
Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry, and that thou bring the
poor that are cast out to thy house? when thou seest the naked, that
thou cover him, and that thou hide not thyself from thine own flesh?
If
Yom Kippur is about abstaining from food, then what is the point of
giving food to the hungry?
י וְתָפֵק
לָרָעֵב נַפְשֶׁךָ, וְנֶפֶשׁ
נַעֲנָה תַּשְׂבִּיעַ; וְזָרַח
בַּחֹשֶׁךְ אוֹרֶךָ, וַאֲפֵלָתְךָ
כַּצָּהֳרָיִם.
10
And if thou draw out thy soul to the hungry, and satisfy the
afflicted soul; then shall thy light rise in darkness, and thy gloom
be as the noon-day;
Here,
Isaiah uses the word Nefesh-soul, in a totally different context from
the halachic understanding. i.e. we have to use our means to help
the ones afflicted. This is not about fasting, quite the opposite, it
is about providing food and welfare to the needy.
These
arguments presented by Isaiah provide a valid interpretation, and
counter-interpretation to traditional halacha of fasting and self
affliction, putting the context of self affliction into another
dimension altogether.
Again,
these are my personal views and I do not claim to have a binding
halachic knowledge of what the correct thing to do on Yom Kippur is.
Bnei Mikra Isaiah got it right..afflict one's self and do G-d's will ..humble yourself
ReplyDelete