Although
Karaites do not follow the same Chanukah practice as the Rabbanites,
the historical events of Chanukah are enlightening to say the least.
The Rabbinical practice if focused on oil and lamps, and they eschew
the military nature of the Hasmonean victory. In fact, the rabbis
decry the militarism of the Hasmoneans, claiming to be a pacifist
sect. The Karaites, on the other hand, point out that the Book of
Maccabees has no mention whatsoever of the alleged oil miracle, nor
is it canonised into the TNK. Hence, Chanukah is not a Biblical
festival. The historical reality behind Chanukah is quite
surprising, and so I will start with the prayer found in Rabbinic
prayer books, known as Al HaNissim. This is in celebration of
miracles, and there is a special version tailored for Purim, as well
as one for Chanukah. This is how the latter reads:
“And [we thank
You] for the miracles, for the redemption, for the mighty deeds, for
the saving acts, and for the wonders which You have wrought for our
ancestors in those days, at this time—
In the days of
Matityahu, the son of Yochanan the High Priest, the Hasmonean and
his sons, when the wicked Hellenic government rose up against
Your people Israel to make them forget Your Torah and violate the
decrees of Your will. But You, in Your abounding mercies, stood by
them in the time of their distress. You waged their battles, defended
their rights, and avenged the wrong done to them. You delivered
the mighty into the hands of the weak, the many into the hands of the
few, the impure into the hands of the pure, the wicked into the hands
of the righteous, and the wanton sinners into the hands of those who
occupy themselves with Your Torah. You made a great and holy name
for Yourself in Your world, and effected a great deliverance and
redemption for Your people Israel to this very day. Then Your
children entered the shrine of Your House, cleansed Your Temple,
purified Your Sanctuary, kindled lights in Your holy courtyards, and
instituted these eight days of Chanukah to give thanks and praise to
Your great Name.”
This
ancient prayer recognises a) the priesthood was the authentic
religious authority of Israel, and b) The Hasmonean priesthood were
righteous, whereas the Seleucid dynasty of Antiochus were evil.
According
to historians, the Pharisees (who were the predecessors and ancestors
of the Rabbis of the oral law) were so bent on destruction of the
Priesthood, that in their opposition to Alexander Janneus, the High
Priest and Hasmonean King, they (Pharisees) sided with Demetrius III
(Seleucid King) in the war between the two.*
These are
the same Pharisees who adhere to the Chanukah formula above – i.e.
the Hasmonean Priests were the legitimate religious authority of
Israel, being pure and righteous, and the Seleucids (Demetrius) are
the evil and impure enemies of Torah and Israel.
So, what
we in fact see here is that, contrary to their proclamations, the
Pharisees allied themselves with the most evil and impure enemies of
Israel, who a generation earlier had all but destroyed the Temple in
Jerusalem. I have shown previously that where the Seleucids failed,
the Pharisees succeeded, i.e. in defiling and destroying the Temple,
and erasing the priesthood. e.g.
http://tanakhemet.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/another-brick-in-temples-fall.html
So it
becomes clear that the intention and strategy of the Pharisees was
nefarious from the very early days. It was to remove the Priesthood
at whatever the cost, even the cost of the Temple itself. The
Festival of Chanukah, the Fast of Av are just act of theatre, which
distract attention from the wicked Pharisees who allied themselves
with Israel's greatest enemies.
* "5. As to Alexander, his own people were seditious against him; for at a
festival which was then celebrated, when he stood upon the altar, and was
going to sacrifice, the nation rose upon him, and pelted him with citrons
[which they then had in their hands, because] the law of the Jews required
that at the feast of tabernacles every one should have branches of the
palm tree and citron tree; which thing we have elsewhere related. They
also reviled him, as derived from a captive, and so unworthy of his
dignity and of sacrificing. At this he was in a rage, and slew of them
about six thousand. He also built a partition-wall of wood round the altar
and the temple, as far as that partition within which it was only lawful
for the priests to enter; and by this means he obstructed the multitude
from coming at him. He also maintained foreigners of Pisidie and Cilicia;
for as to the Syrians, he was at war with them, and so made no use of
them. He also overcame the Arabians, such as the Moabites and Gileadites,
and made them bring tribute. Moreover, he demolished Amathus, while
Theodorus 39 durst not fight with him; but
as he had joined battle with Obedas, king of the Arabians, and fell into
an ambush in the places that were rugged and difficult to be traveled
over, he was thrown down into a deep valley, by the multitude of the
camels at Gadurn, a village of Gilead, and hardly escaped with his life.
From thence he fled to Jerusalem, where, besides his other ill success,
the nation insulted him, and he fought against them for six years, and
slew no fewer than fifty thousand of them. And when he desired that they
would desist from their ill-will to him, they hated him so much the more,
on account of what had already happened; and when he had asked them what
he ought to do, they all cried out, that he ought to kill himself. They
also sent to Demetrius Eucerus, and desired him to make a league of mutual
defense with them."
-source: Josephus; Antiquities, Book 13; ch.13
-source: Josephus; Antiquities, Book 13; ch.13
A Blue Thread is largely in alignment with this argument
ReplyDeletehttp://abluethread.com/2012/12/04/rejection-rebellion-and-revolt/
However, see comments by Zvi in the comments section of the linked article
The Rabbinic account actually changed over time as well. The 'miracle of lights' is not mentioned in the Mishna or Talmud Yerushalmi. It appeared hundreds of years later in the Talmud Bavli. Some would argue on their behalf that due to the eventual corruption of the descendants of the Hasmoneans, the goal of the Rabbanites was to shift the focus onto God instead (after all, any military victory can/should be seen as miraculous). The re-dedication for 8 days was instituted as a separate holiday to make up for the 8 days of Sukkot that were missed as a result of the tarnished Temple. Although you usually make excellent points about the Rabbanites, this is a case where I don't find fault in their bending of history to give credit to God (and not to themselves).
ReplyDeleteBoth pre-Rabbinic and early Rabbinic Ḥanukah was about the Altar's dedication. The first there was a desire among the rabbis to change this was when the miraculous oil jug figured in a Beraita authored around the time the Mishna was published, which was not included in the Mishna but ultimately found its way into the Bavli.
DeleteI could understand a desire by the ancient rabbis to bend history to give credit to God instead of themselves, but cannot condone their contortion of history in order to minimize or delete the part played by righteous priests, who credited Elohim as a matter of course.