An Exercise in Absurdity – Christian and Islamic Claims
Successor religions to the Hebrew
/Judaic religion of the Torah have gone in different directions, however they
each share a common claim of succession to Judaism. Thus, Christianity considers the Old
Testament as being obsolete and the Jews as being rejected. Their “sin” was not for example the violation
of Sabbath or Idolatry laws, but the rejection of Jesus as a divine Messianic
figure. To top this, the Christian
nation, if there is such a thing, has called itself the new Israel. Islam also makes a similar claim. The 7th Century religion claims
that Jews were rejected by God for their sins, presumably for rejecting
Mohammed as a prophet, and the Koran as the ultimate prophetic work. It also claims that the Old Testament was
changed by Jewish scribes (since it does not favour Mohammedan claims). This allegation made about the TNK, which it
at the same time accepts.
The falsity of such claims is
shown in the Torah itself.
Lev 26
44 And yet for all that, when
they are in the land of their enemies, I will not reject them, neither will I
abhor them, to destroy them utterly, and to break My covenant with them; for I
am the LORD their God.
Despite the punishments meted out
to Israel – which are specifically for violation of Written Torah (and not
Mishnah, new testament, Talmud or Koran)
do not result in the creation of a New Israel or a new Covenant.
New Covenant religions have had success in terms of numbers, power,
nationhood and oppression. These
criteria, however are not issues which justify the concept of a new covenant.
It should also be noted that the Talmud itself, in Erubin 21b, boasts of a new
Covenant, which it claims is more cherished than the Old Testament. The Talmud
is in fact doing precisely what Christianity and Islam have done.
In the same Lev 26 we read:
15 and if ye shall reject My
statutes, and if your soul abhor Mine ordinances, so that ye will not do all My
commandments, but break My covenant;
The rabbis teach in the said
Talmud Erubin that we should be more scrupulous in the observance of rabbinic
laws than of Torah law. Furthermore, the
violation of torah law is on 2 fronts.
1) The violation of the law against adding (Deut ch. 4, and 13) and 2) the changing and
violation of many other laws throughout the torah, including but not limited to
the Temple service and Priestly garments.
Thus the permission to consume tail fat; the changing of the Omer
counting etc are still practiced even
without a Temple.
This constitutes a rejection of
the Torah statutes and an abhorrence of ordinances, as in Lev 26:15.
No comments:
Post a Comment