Tuesday, 24 June 2014

Rashi – Controversy

                                                      http://www.anthonyburgess.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/1984-front-195x300.jpg


One of the most iconic rabbinical statements is that cited by Rashi from a Sifrei, and is also in the Midrash, makes an Orwellian statement, which would be fit to fall into the Newspeak rules.

Regarding the alleged authority of the Sanhedrin, it claims:


Even if they tell you that right is left and that left is right (you should listen to the sages) certainly if they tell you right is right and left is left. (Rashi, Deut. 17:11)

This is repeated in Midrash:
You shall not turn aside from the sentence which they shall declare to you to the right hand nor to the left. If they tell you that the right hand is right and the left hand left, listen to them, and even if they shall tell you that the right hand is left and the left hand right.(Midrash Rabbah - The Song of Songs 1:18)


Firstly, this is a misrepresentation of the Torah , Deut 17:


11 According to the law which they shall teach thee, and according to the judgment which they shall tell thee, thou shalt do; thou shalt not turn aside from the sentence which they shall declare unto thee, to the right hand, nor to the left.

This is in the case of a local dispute that cannot be resolved, and is taken to the Kohen in the Temple. Thus, for example, I have a publishing dispute with my friend Shawn, who wants a 50/50 royalty deal, and I am greedy, asking for 51/49 in my favour. We can resolve this between ourselves, or go to the High Priest. The High Priest might say something that is to my benefit or to my friend's, or something that is perfectly just. It is a risk we take that we do not like the final judgement, but it is ultimately our own choice to take this risk. Thus, the Torah commands us not to veer left or right from the decision of the Priest or Judge.

What the Sifrei/Talmudic rabbis did was to transmute the meaning of the Priestly authority, to their own advantage. And not only in matters of High court appeals, but every pronouncement made by rabbis at any time or place.

There was a dissenting voice to this, and it came, surprisingly, from the Jerusalem Talmud.

Is it possible that if they told you right is left and left is right you would have to listen to them? The verse teaches we must follow [the sages] "left and right" only when they tell you right is right, and left is left. (Yerushalmi Horiot 2b)

This is interesting because the Rabbis of the Yerushalmi were the inheritors of the Mishnah, and were not in receipt of such an alleged tradition. This is further evidence of the controversy of the mainstream Babylonian Talmud, in that they differed even from the Yerushalmi. Unsurprisingly, this dissenting view is not accepted by the rabbis, who follow the Babylonian Talmud.



In Deut 13, the law of not adding or subtracting to the Torah is followed immediately by the law of the false prophet, implying that one who adds to the Torah, claiming he has heard it from Moses or God, is a false prophet. In Deut 18, we are told how to test a prophet, or one who claims to have Divine law (eg an unknown revelation from Sinai).

22 When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken; the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously, thou shalt not be afraid of him.

These very powerful and rational Torah commands have application in both Torah law and in science.

No comments:

Post a Comment