Mention
Kabbalah,
and you will be sure to get mixed reactions. The rationalists,
whether
secular or orthodox will trash it, whilst the traditionalists
and the cultists will
take it very seriously.
For
the Rabbis, the kabbalah
is the hidden part of the “oral law£ which was only revealed after
the Talmud. For the skeptic or Karaite this is quite preposterous, it
is not enough that they fabricate the oral law, but then some guy
called Moses De Leon dreams up the Zohar, and it becomes the hidden
book of splendor (much like the book of Mormon is in Christianity).
There
is, however, the rub. One of the most central themes in Kabbalah –
that of reincarnation (which is found nowhere in the
Talmud) is also the most
hotly disputed. Such was the novelty and absurdity of it, that no
less a Rabbinical icon than Saadia Gaon, rejected this as being
false!
http://www.mesora.org/SaadiaGaon-Reincarnation.htm
But the first mention of this idea came not from the Rabbis, but from Anan Ben David – one of the early Karaite leaders. For the rabbis, he was the quintessential founder of karaism, whilst for the Karaites, he was a great unifier, although not strictly a TNK only Jew. He was a great Phariseeic Rabbi and sage who left the Talmudic world, to start or accelerate a new movement, which eventually merged with karaism.
http://www.mesora.org/SaadiaGaon-Reincarnation.htm
But the first mention of this idea came not from the Rabbis, but from Anan Ben David – one of the early Karaite leaders. For the rabbis, he was the quintessential founder of karaism, whilst for the Karaites, he was a great unifier, although not strictly a TNK only Jew. He was a great Phariseeic Rabbi and sage who left the Talmudic world, to start or accelerate a new movement, which eventually merged with karaism.
Anan
introduced the idea of reincarnation to Judaism. This was before the
Zohar, before the Arizal, and before Hassidism. It is not clear where
he sourced the idea from, since Buddhism and Hinduism would have been
known to him. Whether he had early rabbinic teachings or other
sources is not known.
Later
Karaites unanimously rejected this idea, whilst later Rabbanites
embedded it in their “canon”. Today, holding a Saadian view in
the orthodox world would be at best frowned upon, whilst holding an
Ananite view in the karaite world would also be rejected.
Whether
the source is Talmudic or Buddhist, it is still an interesting but
unknowable claim. We have no memory of previous lives, and now
knowledge of what happens to our minds after death. But, it is
counter-intuitive to see how one of the most imaginative rabbinical
doctrines was first written about by a proto- or pre- Karaite.
No comments:
Post a Comment